Bill Clinton was preoccupied with dropping his pants in front of strange women in hotel rooms. Tony Blair was a typical spineless eurocract (but not spineless enough for the position of EU President). George w. Bush – oh, how it pains us to say this – should have stuck to heavy drinking and never run for political office. As leader of the West during the early stages of a no-holds-barred struggle for survival, he failed to name the enemy, did not articulate a strategy for victory and could not unite the people in battle.

Bush’s mismanagement of the the war did more damage to America than his eight-year spending spree. Fiscal conservatives say that he spent like a drunken sailor. At least sailors spend their own money and when they are not spending they defend us from crazed Jihadis. They know the enemy and are not afraid to name him.

Since the Islamist attack on 9/11/01, many Western leaders have been telling their people that “Islam means peace”, that the terrorists have hijacked the religion and that there are no Islamic terrorists. More recently, Barack Hussein Obama decreed that there are no terrorists. According to Eric Holder and Janet Napolitano, Americans are the terrorists.

So what is the truth about Islam? Is it peaceful or is it violent? Is it a religion, like Judaism and Christianity, or is it a cult with a dangerous supremacist ideology? Does it treat women with dignity and respect or does its institutionalize female subservience and wife beating? Is Sharia Law just or is it a savage dogma that codifies the inferior status of infidels? Does Islam promote Utopian multiculturalism or does it relegate Jews and Christians to Dhimmi status? In Muslim countries, are Jews and Christians accepted as equals or are they forced to pay the jizya tax to their Muslim overlords in willing submission? If Muslims become the majority in America will they really oppress everybody else?

Relying primarily on Islam’s own sources, the documentary What the West Needs to Know shows that Islam is a violent, expansionary ideology that seeks the destruction of all other faiths. Muhammad, founder of the world’s most violent religion, started his career as a prophet by exterminating the Jews of Yathrib (Medina). Later he banished both Judaism and Christianity from Arabia. He personally beheaded hundreds of vanquished Jews, distributing their wives as concubines to Allah’s holy warriors. On his dying bed, he ordered his followers to maintain an apartheid State in Arabia. Read more >

Even as some Muslims blow up in public places, others hold conventions to spread the faith in the lands of the infidels. On December 25, the Islamic Circle of North America gathered in Atlanta for an annual hatefest.

In Toronto, Muslims have gathered for Reviving the Islamic Spirit (RIS).

Close to 17,000 Muslims came to Metro Toronto’s Convention Centre on Friday – Christmas Day – to learn about their religion and being a Muslim in a modern world.

They heard from Islamic scholars, prayed, visited with family and friends and shopped in a bazaar that offered up a variety of wares, including hand-embroidered shawls, books, T-shirts, hijabs for both women and children, jewellery and hijab pins.

It was all part of a three-day convention “Reviving the Islamic Spirit,” an annual conference with its roots in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attack. It is designed, organizers say, as a way to help young Muslims understand their faith in a North American context.

The promotional video for the event is a sleek quality production.

Read more >

Does this crap sway anybody? The answer must be yes. Otherwise, San Francisco wouldn’t exist.

Avatar is the kind of movie you get when you liberate a bunch of crazed Hollywood lefties from all financial constraints. With a $240 million budget, James Cameron managed to squeeze  every last Marxist fantasy into three hours of boring propaganda.

With the plot conveniently available on the Internet and no first rank stars, the balk of the money went into producing the special effects, with very impressive results. Not impressive enough, however, to offset the endless flow of anti-American, anti-capitalist, global warming claptrap.

The plot goes something like this. Capitalism, global warming and war destroy earth. Capitalists, aided by the Military, try to do the same to the beautiful, breath-taking planet Pandora. They are after – wait for it – unobtainium, because it sells for $20 million dollars a kilogram on the open market- about the same as a Hollywood star. We’ll never know why Earthmen need  unobtainium or why they are willing to pay so much for it. Apparently, it is just one of those things evil capitalist do. Read more >

Nature Magazine, the international weekly journal of science, is at it again. In the 1940′s the magazine published opinion pieces in support of purging Jews from academia. Now they run opinion pieces in defense of Al Gore’s scam. Normal people recognize that the East-Anglia emails prove, beyond any shadow of doubt, that climatologists and politicians are the scum of the earth, conspiring to rob the rest of us to the benefit of their own cash flow. Now, make sure you are sitting down, the significance of the emails according to Nature is that:

1. They were obtained “unethically.”
2. They prove that scientists are human.
3. They demonstrate that scientists are smart.
4. They demonstrate that normal people are ignorant boobs.
5. They are a call for decent people to support the East-Anglia fascists!
6. They prove that “something is happening”
7. You must give your money to poor people and scientists, or something.
8. The “denialists” must be defeated!
9. Scientists should avoid getting caught.
10. The scam must go on.

This opinion piece in Nature falls into the “as the stomach turns” category.

Climatologists under pressure

Stolen e-mails have revealed no scientific conspiracy, but do highlight ways in which climate researchers could be better supported in the face of public scrutiny.

The e-mail archives stolen last month from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (UEA), UK, have been greeted by the climate-change-denialist fringe as a propaganda windfall (see page 551). To these denialists, the scientists’ scathing remarks about certain controversial palaeoclimate reconstructions qualify as the proverbial ‘smoking gun’: proof that mainstream climate researchers have systematically conspired to suppress evidence contradicting their doctrine that humans are warming the globe. Read more >

Are you worried that a deeply disloyal soldier, who openly confessed allegiance to the Islamist enemy, managed to attain the rank of Major in the United States military? Chris Matthews isn’t.

Given the predisposition of the media against anything American, Christian or Israeli, it is not surprising that a Jihadi attack on an army base in Texas, by a devout Muslim, inspires (P)MSNBC to worry about rampant Islamophobia. It is impossible to miss Chris Matthews’ pandering to the Muslim overlords. The smirk on Nihad’s face, at the end, shows that he recognizes a subservient dhimmi when he sees one. Read more >

So, another Muslim stealth Jihadi shoots up an army base,  kills 11 soldiers and injures 31. Every sane person is thinking “Sudden Jihad Syndrome” or “Islamic terrorism”. Watching Fox News, we wait for the name. Does it start with an M? Two hour later Shlep Smith still refuses to reveal the identity of the attacker. We become suspicious. We check online. Jihad Watch and Debbie Schlussel both reveal that, yes, the shooter’s name is Major Nidal Malik Hasan (close enough). Now we know.

The cable channels, including Fox News, are twisting themselves into pretzels to avoid being accused of Islamophobia. Lou Dobbs invites a post traumatic stress disorder specialist to explain how combat can destroy a man’s mind. Too bad, Lou, Major Hasan served at Walter Reed Hospital. No combat, until today. On Fox, they are focusing on Nidal’s unhappiness at being deployed to Iraq. As if he is some sort of anti-war activist.

Col. Terry Lee (a co-worker), interviewed by both Shlep Smith and Sean Hannity, tries to explain, without invoking a fatwa, that Major Hasan is a Jihadi. Still, they twist it into a job dissatisfaction issue. Sean keeps stating the Hasan “did not want to go to war” and was “very upset about it.” Hasan, obviously did want to go to war. That is precisely what he did in Fort Hood. He conducted Jihad, a holy war, against America. He did not want to go to war against his Muslim brothers.

Inside Shlep Smiths empty mind there hides a really dumb news reader (think Ted Bexter), but he did let Col. Lee tell his story. Sean Hannity gingerly danced around the Jihad angle. Gretta did the best job, opening with Jihad as the likely motive. Will the media ever figure it out?

Major Hasan, who is apparently still alive and in custody, turns out to be a lousy psychiatrist. Read more >

We couldn’t resist reproducing this post from On the Pisiiing section of Clareification, the weekly student newsletter of Clare College, Cambridge University. Students can be so precocious!

Saturday, February 3, 2007

It’s a year since the demonstration outside the Danish Embassy in London, featuring, among others, the placards shown below. These and numerous other Muslims worldwide were protesting against cartoons that depicted Muhammad and suggested that Islam was violent. More than a hundred people were killed during the protests, including some who were, for example, burned alive by mobs.

In the words of the great sage Jamie Foxx: We shall fucking see

Its a few months since the Pope’s speech produced a similar response. Which brings me to: Read more >

In a eulogy of his recently departed father Douglas Bloomfield demonstrates the insanity of Liberals. Of all things, he uses the article to attack Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck. To understand how strange this is ask yourself whether you would use a eulogy of your dad to attack Barack Hussein Obama?

Mr. Bloomfield ascribes to his father his own prejudices. Way to go, Doug. The 65% of Americans who are Conservative will forever believe that your father was at best uninformed. For all we know, Dad was probably a nice man. Why would you defame him?

To say that Limbaugh has an agenda of fear and hate with no ideas or policy is simply ignorant. To say that Glenn Beck engages in race-bating is criminal, even if the cause is stupidity rather than malice. Doug, don’t read about it in the NYT. Listen to Rush and Glen and you’ll be surprised. Most of all, don’t speak ill of your late father. Read more >

In October 2008 candidate Barck “Barry” Obama promised that his election will bring about world peace – water levels will recede, cancer will be cured and America will be punished. A mere twelve months later, children are already singing the legend that is Barck Hussein Obama (rhymes with Osama). Read more >

Friends,

Toronto had a film festival highlighting movies about Tel Aviv.  You’d think a city that pre-dates the Jewish State, one not in the “occupied territories” would not be controversial.  Guess what?  Jane Fonda, Danny Glover and Eve Ensler (that basket case) Naomi Klein, Alice Walker  etc. are protesting, signing a letter which says: “we are deeply disturbed by [TIFF's] decision to host a celebratory spotlight on Tel Aviv,” the letter begins. “We protest that TIFF, whether intentionally or not, has become complicit in the Israeli propaganda machine…we object to the use of such an important international festival in staging a propaganda campaign on behalf of … an apartheid regime.”

And now, the festival’s director, Cameron Bailey, whose good idea it was in the first place to focus on Tel Aviv, has backed down, calling Tel Aviv “contested ground” and vowing: “to learn more about the Palestinian-led Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement.”  Contested by whom?  The Hamas?

Just shows you the inroads of Palestinian hate speak, and the useful idiots involved. Read more >