Back in the 1990s I invented the term, “Bibi Peresyahu” to refer to the prime Ministership of Bibi Netanyahu back then. At the time, Netanyahu was trying to outdo the Israeli Labor Party and Shimon Peres in pursuing the Oslo “peace process.” Netanyahu made concessions even Peres had refused to make, like turning Hebron over to the savages.

He signed the “Wye Accord,” after which I dubbed him the Wye’s Man of Chelm. In domestic matters he refused to do anything serious to break up the bank cartel or reform the capital market. His main concern was to be liked by the Israeli leftist media, and that concern caused him to shift to the Left. The same concern later led Ariel Sharon by the nose to the Left and to capitulation to Hamas in Gaza.

Well, Bibi Peresyahu is back. He keeps freezing Jewish building in Jerusalem and its surroundings. A few days ago he announced his backing for a series of anti-economic populist policy measures favored by the ultra-Left, like raising the minimum wage and subsidizing water consumption. Yesterday Peresyahu came out AGAINST any parliamentary investigation of leftwing seditious anti-Israel NGOs operating in Israel. When asked why he is suddenly against this very popular proposal he had earlier supported, Netanyahu without blinking replied, “But what will the goyim (nations) say.” Really. Never mind that the nations have lots of similar laws operating in their own countries for NGOs receiving foreign funding. In the US, any group getting foreign funding has to register as a lobbyist for a foreign entity.

Maybe Bibi can attend the J Street conference so that the Left will like him more?

Liberals will not get this, but Allen West is a real man. He comes equipped with facts and fears no one, not even a Hamas operative masquerading as a human rights activist.

Wikipedia defines Hamas as as an Islamist political party classified as a terrorist organization by certain countries (Israel, United States). Wikipedia defines CAIR as America’s largest Muslim civil liberties advocacy organization that deals with civil advocacy and promotes human rights. Clearly Allen West does not get his information from Wikipedia.

Bill Whittle, of Eject! Eject! Eject!, has a new project. He is taking on Hollywood and his first effort is nothing short of brilliant. Channeling Edmund Burke, Friedrich Hayek, Milton Friedman and Thomas Sowell, Whittle explains the Tea Party, limited government and free markets in less than 10 minutes. This video makes a great gift to email to your Liberal friends. I have tried it and it works.

Help Whittle defeat Hollywood at Declaration Entertainment.

Of course, Milton Friedman is still irreplaceable.

Think about it. How many people did witches kill in the 20th century? Maybe one or two, maximum eleven. How many did bearded Marxists kill? At least 200,000,000 (yes, that reads two hundred million). Marxists, bearded and otherwise, oppressed billions, caused innumerable bloody wars and drove dozens of nations to bankruptcy. How many people have witches oppressed? How many countries have they bankrupted, in the past two thousand years?

The witch is cute. Vote for the witch. It’s the cool thing to do.

The bearded Marxist is not cool. He is downright creepy. He looks like he has bodies buried in his basement. Don’t vote for him.

Sarah Palin wants you to vote for Christine O’Donnell, the cute witch and not for Chris Coons, the Marxist who will help Barack Hussein Obama destroy America.

An insane judge in Amsterdam put Europe on trial and the Islamists are watching. If Geert Wilders is penalized for his heroic efforts to save the West from Sharia Law, then Europe is doomed. Muammar Al Gathafi once boasted that Islam will conquer Europe without firing a single shot. He was right.

Read: Dutch anti-Islam lawmaker challenges race trial judges.

Dutch anti-Islamist politician Geert Wilders, a key player in efforts to form a new government, accused judges trying him on charges of inciting hatred of scandalous bias and demanded they be replaced.

Wilders, who has 24-hour police guard because of death threats, went on trial Monday over comments including a comparison he made between the Islamic faith and Nazism.

The prosecutor, reacting to complaints about Wilders, originally said he was protected by the right to free speech, but a court overruled him and ordered that Wilders be charged.

Read: All Death Threats Are Not Created Equal.

Let’s take a step back and understand this. Former Muslim and author Wafa Sultan, former Muslim and Dutch MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali, scholar Robert Spencer, former Muslim and scholar Ibn Warraq, scholar Bat Ye’or, former Muslim Nonie Darwish, cartoonist Lars Vilks, cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, Danish newspaper publisher Flemming Rose, South Park producers Trey Parker and Matt Stone, Salman Rushdie and countless others, myself included, receive horrible threats all the time. Wafa Sultan is the only Southpark1 American living in hiding. Geert Wilders lives under round-the-clock tight security because of the hundreds of death threats he receives every year. Theo Van Gogh was murdered in cold blood in the streets of The Netherlands because of a perceived insult to Islam (photo below).

Read: U.K.’s Telegraph: “Geert Wilders’ trial suspended after he attacks judge!” Wait… what?

The Telegraph is usually better than this, and does a great deal of useful reporting on stories related to the Islamization of Britain. But the choice of words to describe Wilders’ demand that a biased judge be replaced is so very ironic here, considering that his own life is in danger over words and a film that insulted Islam.

He is on trial for just that. Indeed, he is the one under “attack” by the court for exercising his natural and legal rights to free speech in what happened to be politically incorrect way. This is the sort of trial one would expect to find recorded in black-and-white or sepia-toned photographs from a time long since past, spoken of in the same tones as the Scopes trial is today.

Theo Van Gogh was killed by a Muslim who didn't like his movie.

Keep Working! Millions On Welfare Rely On You!

Racists!

“Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society… then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them… We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.”
— Karl Popper

According to Qur’an 3:167, Muslims who refuse to fight in the name of Allah are hypocrites. Believers answer the call of Jihad to fight in Allah’s cause. Muhammad, Islam’s only Prophet, labels non-believers “infidels” – enemies of Allah. He orders Muslims to fight, murder and enslave them until the whole world surrenders to Islam. The order to fight infidels is clear, open ended and retractable only by Allah.

Qur’an 8:039 – And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is all for Allah.

Qur’an 9:005 – Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush.

No mere present day Imam can abrogate these commandments. In view of the severe consequences, to us, is it not prudent to ask whether Christians and Jews qualify as infidels?

At least one Tea Party activist at Glenn Beck’s Restoring Honor rally seems to believe that Muslims indeed want to kill us because we are infidels. Where did he get such an idea? Can you say 9/11?

For insight into what makes a good Muslim, written by a former good Muslim, read our 2008/1/22 post:

Does the Koran Command Muslims to Fight and Kill Infidels?

Diana West writes about the Ground Zero Mosque and tolerating the intolerant. Read more >

It shouldn’t take courage to be black and conservative in America. Unfortunately, the drive-by media’s malicious ignorance requires heroism of informed blacks who want to speak out. Democrat party apparatchiks, lefty academics and pompous “journalists” see every economic, social or political event through race colored glasses. Intentionally, they stir up racial angst to spread their fascist world view. In a way, they act on the same principles as the Stealth Jihadis. Thankfully, Tea Party activists know the truth and are not intimidated.

If the next President of the United States is not a Kenyan, she will have to surgically remove the Islamist cancer that is the Obama legacy to America. It is not going to be easy. All department at all levels have been infested by Islamists, sympathizers and apologists. Everywhere you look, you see living proof that Jews and Christians cannot trust Obama.

The only prudent course of action for the next President will be to fumigate the whole federal bureaucracy. Unfortunately, no Republican prospective candidate for President seems to have the cohones to do what needs to be done. Which candidate will be prepared to fire every single civil servant hired during the Obama reign? Newt Gingrich? Mitt Romney? Sarah Palin? Maybe.

The regime’s Antisemitism Czar is a self-hating Jewess. Hannah Rosenthal  believes that the best way to combat Antisemitism is to destroy Israel.

Remarks by Israel’s ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, against the liberal Jewish lobby J Street were “most unfortunate” according to Hannah Rosenthal, head of the U.S. administration’s Office to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism.

In an interview with Haaretz in Jerusalem, where Rosenthal was the administration’s envoy to the Foreign Ministry’s Global Forum for Combating Anti-Semitism, Rosenthal, who once served on J street’s board of directors, said she opposes blurring the lines between anti-Semitism and criticism of Israel.

“It is not 1939,” she said. “We have the state of Israel. We have laws in countries that are holding people accountable.”

The regime’s latest Czar, Donald Berwick, is another anti-Israel activist Jew-hater. They had to sneak him in via a recess appointment to oversee the Medicare trillions. Berwick is also a hard-core collectivist ideologue who delights in punishing “the rich.”

Even dumber than Mayor Bloomberg is Steve Chapman, a supposedly Conservative columnist, who is trying to differentiate himself from other Conservatives by adopting far out lefty ideas. In Repeal Religious Freedoms at ground Zero? Chapman offers an irrelevant analogy to set up a series of meaningless rhetorical questions.

Suppose there were a heavily Muslim neighborhood in New York, with mosques, religious schools and shops with meat prepared according to Islamic dietary rules. Suppose an evangelical church wanted to build a chapel there. And suppose local Muslims tried to block it as a flagrant insult to them.

Would Sarah Palin urge the church to retract this “unnecessary provocation” in the “interest of healing”? Would her followers? Or would they scorn this disparagement of Christianity and champion the religious freedom on which America was built?

You know the answer. But Palin is not a slave to intellectual consistency. Change the church to a mosque, and put it a couple of blocks from the site of the World Trade Center, and she suddenly loses all patience with the rights of religious believers.

For the analogy to hold, Chapman’s first paragraph would have to be modified slightly. Read more >