A quick survey of NEA statements confirms that schools in the United States have been hijacked by crazed Liberal educators. However, the situation in the USA looks healthy in comparison to Europe, particularly France and Germany. Read more >

The University of Toronto, York University and Ryerson University hosted Israeli Apartheid Week events to commemorate Al-Nakba, the catastrophe, which is the name Arab invaders have given to Israel’s Independence Day. Jihadis consider any Jew escaping death a catastophe. Here is a report from the University of Toronto.

Anti Israel bias (the new anti-Semitism) at the University of Toronto

The University of Toronto is a world-renowned institution, generously funded by the taxpayers. It is the place where insulin was discovered. It is also the birthplace of “Israel Apartheid Week” (IAW), an annual, week-long, anti-Israel symposium with associated anti-Semitic activities that in four short years has spread to campuses throughout Canada, as well as in the United States, Europe, Africa and the Middle East. The stated aim of IAW is “to push forward the analysis of Israel as an apartheid state and to bolster support for a boycott, divestment, and sanctions campaign”. The IAW includes presentations by individuals that are on record either calling for the destruction of Israel, supporting terrorism against Israel, denying the Holocaust, and/or expressing anti-Semitic views. This event has also been used as a platform to spread anti-Semitism outside of the university system. In 2007, the IAW at the U of T included a “Day of Action” to initiate a boycott of a book retailer owned and operated by prominent Jewish philanthropists with ties to Israel.

A UN resolution designates “apartheid” as a crime against humanity. Therefore, to label Israel as an “apartheid state” is to convict supporters of Israel at the university and elsewhere as accessories to a reprehensible international crime. IAW creates an atmosphere on campus that is hostile to Jewish students and to students and faculty that have affinity for the Jewish people or Israel. A Jewish student organization on campus has filed formal grievances with the University administration in response to this event. Faculty members have also asked the administration to shut it down. Indeed, last year, 70 non-Jewish and Jewish Professors signed a letter respectfully requesting that it be stopped. In addition to student and faculty groups, Hillel, the Canadian Coalition for Democracies and B’nai Brith have all expressed concerns over the hosting of IAW by the U of T.
Read more >

Update: more posts on this subject at World Reacts to Israel’s No Rape Strategy and Complete Story of “No Rape = Racism” Essay.

I wish I were making this up as some sort of a pre-Purim joke. But it seems that the latest anti-Israel outrage coming out of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem is its awarding a prize to a graduate student for an essay in which the student claims that Israel is abusing and oppressing Palestinians by not raping their women.

Really.

Had it not been awarded a prize by a panel of the Hebrew University’s distinguished professors, the whole matter could be dismissed as just another idiotic essay by a moonbat grad student, not something worthy of any attention being paid to it. But according to news reports, the essay in question has now been published by the Hebrew University’s “Shaine Center,” at the enthusiastic recommendation of a Hebrew University professors’ committee headed by Dr. Zali Gurevitch. The latter is a leftist anthropologist who taught for several years at Knox College in Galesburg, Illinois. Don’t worry, I never heard of it either. His web page is here. Gurevich runs the Shaine Center, which awarded the prize. His fellow perps in this atrocity are listed here.

I wonder if the Shaine family knows what is being done with their contributions to the university!

The essay indicting Israeli soldiers for not raping Palestinian women was the product of the crayon of an MA student named Tal Nitzan. Tal is a she.

Her main theme is that the “lack of IDF rapes of Palestinian women is designed to serve a political purpose.” The “political purpose” is that Israel fears the Palestinians demographically and so IDF soldiers do not rape the women to avoid creating new Palestinians and little intifaders.

Here is Nitzan at her finest: “In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, it can be seen that the lack of military rape merely strengthens the ethnic boundaries and clarifies the inter-ethnic differences – just as organized military rape would have done.” Israeli racism has resulted in suppressed Jewish-male sexual desire for Palestinian women, just another manifestation of Zionist racism. Since the absence of rape of Arab women by Israeli soldiers has no parallel in any other human army in wartime anytime in history, the only conclusion must be that Jewish soldiers are far more racist and intolerant than the others.

Now Nitzan and her guru Gurevitch rule out automatically all other alternative explanations for why Israeli troops do not rape Arab women.

The possibility that Israeli troops are simply civilized humans is ruled out as an imponderable. Ditto for the possibility that Jewish ethics serve to deter such abuse of Arab women.

Instead, Nitzan claims that Arab women in Judea and Samaria are not raped by IDF soldiers because the women are “de-humanized” in the soldiers’ eyes. I guess that means they are not rape worthy. You know, unlike Shulamit Aloni, Yael Dayan, and Tamar Gozansky.
Read more >

Mixing the scientific work of satellite TV channel Bravo with a bit of amateur Photoshop magic enabled us to uncover the final stages of human evolution, as our race deteriorates back to its primitive origins.

The last three figures on the right look a lot like Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Democrat Presidential Candidate Dennis Kucinich and Daily KOS lunatic Markos Moulitsas Zuniga. Things are not going to end well. In 100,000 years or so, the human race will split into two groups. One group will look like a seven foot tall George Clooney, the other like Danny DeVito.

According to evolutionary theorist Oliver Curry the human race will have reached its physical peak by the year 3000 and it will be all downhill from there.

The future for our descendants isn’t all long life, perfect bodies and chiseled features, however.

While humans will reach their peak in 1000 years’ time, 10,000 years later our reliance on technology will have begun to dramatically change our appearance.

Medicine will weaken our immune system and we will begin to appear more child-like.

Dr Curry said: “The report suggests that the future of man will be a story of the good, the bad and the ugly.

“While science and technology have the potential to create an ideal habitat for humanity over the next millennium, there is the possibility of a monumental genetic hangover over the subsequent millennium due to an over-reliance on technology reducing our natural capacity to resist disease, or our evolved ability to get along with each other.

“After that, things could get ugly, with the possible emergence of genetic ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’.”

Read more >

Support the Boycott! End the Occupation!

A Call for Action against Occupation from the Israel Professors for Justice and Peace.

We, Israeli professors for justice and peace, do hereby appeal to researchers, academics, scholars, and teachers in Israel and throughout the world to take a firm and clear stand against continuing occupation and denial of rights. We are of course referring to the continuing occupation of territories by Britain in which Britain clearly has no right to be. We demand that all British universities be boycotted and all academics at those universities be boycotted until these same people and institutions come out clearly and openly in favor of immediate unconditional removal of all British occupation from these territories. We demand a moratorium on all funding of academic research in Britain by sources for funding everywhere and divestment from Britain in all its forms.

Unlike Israel’s “occupation” of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the latter of which is not occupied any longer in any way, which has lasted a mere 40 years, but Britain’s occupations of territories has lasted centuries. Take for example the clearly illegal British occupation of Gibraltar. There Britain maintains an illegal settlement in open defiance of all international accepted standards of legitimacy and concepts of national rights. Moreover, Britain has placed there an illegal security fence that prevents non-British nationals from entering Gibraltar. This apartheid fence is a human rights atrocity and must be torn down at once. And until it is, the entire world should divest from Britain and boycott British universities.
Read more >