On September 11, 2001 Muslims attacked America, killing 3,000 office workers in New York City, the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania. In the Middle East, Arabs rejoiced, handed out candy and danced in the streets of Ramallah, Gaza and Karachi. In Saudi Arabia the Sheiks celebrated victory. On 9/11, their $62 billion investment in mosques, madrassas and Islamic Centers had paid off.

Ten years later, what we had sworn to never forget, most of us can hardly remember. The media tirelessly works to obscure the basic fact that Muslims attacked us on 9-11. The New York Times, Washington Post, MSNBC, CNN and even Fox News depict 9/11 as the beginning of Islamophobia in America. In a perverse way, Osama Bin Laden has won. America is tired of fighting. Islamists and Islamic apologists hold key positions in the Pentagon, State Department and Homeland Security. Heck, a Muslim-born, madrassa-trained, Jew-hating fascist occupies the White House.

Of all things, the best way to recall the 9/11 attack on America by Saudi and Egyptian Muslims may be by listening to the the Howard Stern Show from that crucial morning.

Part 1 (It begins – I know who’s doing it)

Part 2

Read more >

Liberals will not get this, but Allen West is a real man. He comes equipped with facts and fears no one, not even a Hamas operative masquerading as a human rights activist.

Wikipedia defines Hamas as as an Islamist political party classified as a terrorist organization by certain countries (Israel, United States). Wikipedia defines CAIR as America’s largest Muslim civil liberties advocacy organization that deals with civil advocacy and promotes human rights. Clearly Allen West does not get his information from Wikipedia.

Finally! The Israelis are developing an airport security device that eliminates the privacy concerns that come with full-body scanners at the airports.

It’s a booth you can step into that will not X-ray you, but will detonate any explosive device you have on you. They see this as a win-win for everyone, with no crap about racial profiling. It also would eliminate the costs of long and expensive trials. Justice would be swift. Case closed!

You’re in the airport terminal and you hear a muffled explosion. Shortly thereafter an announcement comes over the PA system . . . “Attention standby passengers — we now have a seat available on flight number XXXX.    Shalom”  – Unknown author

Struggling to stay above water in the ratings race, Christiane Amanpour tackled the hot topic of Islam on This Week, ABC’s rapidly sinking program. She invited some outstanding talking-heads for the non-Islamist, pro-West side – Robert Spencer, Rev. Franklin Graham and Gary Bauer in a cameo appearance. Though the in-studio audience was stacked with apologists for Islam and gullible lefties and despite her self-righteous “crusade” against “Islamophobia,” Amanpour did let the “Islamophobes” finish their sentences, resulting in the audience actually receiving useful information.

“I understand what the Muslims want to do in America. They want to build as many mosques and cultural centers as possible so they can convert as many Americans as they can to Islam. Look, I love the Muslim people, but I have great difficulties with the Religion, especially with Shariah law, what it does to women and to non-believers and the violence that is given under Shariah law.” — Rev. Graham

Daisy Khan, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf’s wife, found her mission of doing taqiyya (the Islamic practice of lying to infidels for the sake of Allah), complicated by Imam Anjem Choudary, who appeared via a live video feed from London. He truthfully explained the global ambitions of Shariah. “Proof of Islam’s diversity,” exclaimed Daisy. Of course, Choudary was the only Imam on the panel and his “views” are not only best informed, but also most authoritative.

“We do believe as Muslims, the East and the West will one day be governed by the Shariah. Indeed we believe that one day the flag of Islam will fly over the White House. Indeed there  is even an oration of the Prophet (Muhammad, Ed.) when he said the Day of Judgment will not come until a group of my Ummah (Nation, Ed.) conquers the white house.” — Imam Anjem Choudary, live from London.

Few people dare to speak the truth about Islam in public, because Muslims have a nasty habit of beheading those who stand in their way. That’s why Robert Spencer and Franklin Graham are such heroic figures in this clash of civilizations. However, beyond any doubt, the bravest warrior for the West is Geert Wilders. You may recall his inspirational speech at Ground Zero.

Wilders spoke in Berlin yesterday, alerting Europe, yet again, to the existential danger Islam poses to our way of life. He spoke German, but here is the complete English transcript.

Dear Friends,

I am very happy to be here in Berlin today. As you know, the invitation which my friend René Stadtkewitz extended to me, has cost him his membership of the CDU group in the Berlin Parliament. René, however, did not give in to the pressure. He did not betray his convictions. His dismissal prompted René to start a new political party. I wish him all the best. As you may have heard, the past weeks were extremely busy for me. Earlier this week we succeeded in forging a minority government of the Liberals and the Christian-Democrats which will be supported by my party. This is an historic event for the Netherlands. I am very proud of having helped to achieve this. At this very moment the Christian-Democrat Party conference is deciding whether or not to approves this coalition. If they do, we will be able to rebuild our country, preserve our national identity and offer our children a better future.

Despite my busy schedule at home, however, I insisted on coming to Berlin, because Germany, too, needs a political movement to defend German identity and to oppose the Islamization of Germany. Chancellor Angela Merkel says that the Islamization of Germany is inevitable. She conveys the message that citizens have to be prepared for more changes as a result of immigration. She wants the Germans to adapt to this situation. The Christian-Democrat leader said: “More than before mosques will be an integral part of our cities.”

My friends, we should not accept the unacceptable as inevitable without trying to turn the tide. It is our duty as politicians to preserve our nations for our children. I hope that René’s movement will be as successful as my own Partij voor de Vrijheid, as Oskar Freysinger’s Schweizerische Volkspartei in Switzerland, as Pia Kjaersgaard’s Dansk Folkeparti in Denmark, and similar movements elsewhere. Read more >

President Barack Hussein Obama killed Yitzhak Ames, 47, and his wife Tali Ames, 45, Kochava Ben-Haim, 37, and Avishai Schindler, 24, all from Beit Hagai, by providing financing, moral support and hope to the terrorists who pulled the trigger. Let the peace talks begin.

Israelis are in for a rough September and disastrous 2011 as Obama becomes more desperate to produce a “peace.” Israel National News provides interesting stats.

The terror attack is typical of Arab “resistance” attacks that intentionally target civilian victims. A survey carried out by a PA organization in early August found that among the Arab public in the Palestinian Authority, over 55% view violence as either essential or desirable, nearly 31% see it as either acceptable or tolerable, and only 13.7% say it is unacceptable.

The attack was probably timed to coincide with and affect the direct talks between Israel and the PA in Washington, D.C., that are to begin Thursday. Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said upon landing in Washington that the talks would proceed as planned, despite the murders, evoking memories of PM Yitshak Rabin’s term “sacrifices for peace” for the post Oslo accord terror attacks, which cost tens of Israelis their lives.

Oh, yes, the infamous “sacrifices for peace.” How come only Jews must make them? If Israelis shot and killed four Arabs near Hebron, you just know Abbas would walk out of the talks in an Arafat minute.

“Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society… then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them… We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.”
— Karl Popper

According to Qur’an 3:167, Muslims who refuse to fight in the name of Allah are hypocrites. Believers answer the call of Jihad to fight in Allah’s cause. Muhammad, Islam’s only Prophet, labels non-believers “infidels” – enemies of Allah. He orders Muslims to fight, murder and enslave them until the whole world surrenders to Islam. The order to fight infidels is clear, open ended and retractable only by Allah.

Qur’an 8:039 – And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is all for Allah.

Qur’an 9:005 – Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush.

No mere present day Imam can abrogate these commandments. In view of the severe consequences, to us, is it not prudent to ask whether Christians and Jews qualify as infidels?

At least one Tea Party activist at Glenn Beck’s Restoring Honor rally seems to believe that Muslims indeed want to kill us because we are infidels. Where did he get such an idea? Can you say 9/11?

For insight into what makes a good Muslim, written by a former good Muslim, read our 2008/1/22 post:

Does the Koran Command Muslims to Fight and Kill Infidels?

Diana West writes about the Ground Zero Mosque and tolerating the intolerant. Read more >

Islam and the Judeo-Christian world are rival civilizations. How difficult is that to understand? Apparently, very difficult. Pundits, Liberal and Conservative, when asked to comment on the latest Muslim to blow up in public behind infidel lines, all start their reply with “of course, not all Muslims…” or “of course, most Muslims…” or some other inane homage to the gods of political correctness.

Even Conservative icons like Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck back-paddle rapidly when accused of “Islamophobia” in public. They don’t exactly apologize, but they resort to accusing the accuser of playing the race card. Liberals do love to play the guilt game. “Do you hate all Muslims?” or “You are against Islam!” Oh, what we wouldn’t pay to just once hear Sean Hannity respond with “Of course I am against Islam. I am a devout Catholic. Islam is a rival civilization hell-bent on conquering the world for Allah. How could I be for it? How can you be for it? Aren’t you Jewish/Christian?”

But alas, he was asked and he squirmed and he had no answer.

Thank G-d for the creative minds who get what Islam is all about and who can express it so well.

Of course, Pat Condell is right. It would be totally insane to allow the enemy to run a victory lap on the graves of our friends. With the public overwhelmingly opposed to a mosque rising from the 9/11 ashes, it is surprising that New York politicians are not jumping on the bandwagon.

Carl Paladino, a Republican candidate for Governor of New York, is the only one to come out against the Islamic supremacist mega-mosque at Ground Zero.

“As Governor,” Paladino said Wednesday in a radio ad, “I will use the power of eminent domain to stop this mosque and make the site a war memorial instead of a monument to those who attacked our country.”

I like this guy. I really like this guy. If the Supreme Court could rule, in the notorious 2005 decision Kelo v. City of New London, that the government could seize private property for a private developer and then never develop the property, surely Americans should be able to use eminent domain to designate the Burlington Coat Factory building a war memorial.

That building is a war memorial since part of one of the 9/11 airplanes crashed into it, causing severe damage. That makes the building a war memorial, no less than Gettysburg or Pearl Harbor. There should be no mosque there, and nothing there but a memorial to the people that America lost to that heinous Islamic jihad attack on September 11, 2001.

READ: The Man Who Would Stop the Ground Zero Mosque

If the next President of the United States is not a Kenyan, she will have to surgically remove the Islamist cancer that is the Obama legacy to America. It is not going to be easy. All department at all levels have been infested by Islamists, sympathizers and apologists. Everywhere you look, you see living proof that Jews and Christians cannot trust Obama.

The only prudent course of action for the next President will be to fumigate the whole federal bureaucracy. Unfortunately, no Republican prospective candidate for President seems to have the cohones to do what needs to be done. Which candidate will be prepared to fire every single civil servant hired during the Obama reign? Newt Gingrich? Mitt Romney? Sarah Palin? Maybe.

The regime’s Antisemitism Czar is a self-hating Jewess. Hannah Rosenthal  believes that the best way to combat Antisemitism is to destroy Israel.

Remarks by Israel’s ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, against the liberal Jewish lobby J Street were “most unfortunate” according to Hannah Rosenthal, head of the U.S. administration’s Office to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism.

In an interview with Haaretz in Jerusalem, where Rosenthal was the administration’s envoy to the Foreign Ministry’s Global Forum for Combating Anti-Semitism, Rosenthal, who once served on J street’s board of directors, said she opposes blurring the lines between anti-Semitism and criticism of Israel.

“It is not 1939,” she said. “We have the state of Israel. We have laws in countries that are holding people accountable.”

The regime’s latest Czar, Donald Berwick, is another anti-Israel activist Jew-hater. They had to sneak him in via a recess appointment to oversee the Medicare trillions. Berwick is also a hard-core collectivist ideologue who delights in punishing “the rich.”

Follow the logic. Muslims declared war on Jews. Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim. Therefore, Obama is at war with the Jews. Simple mathematical logic.

PLO Flag to Fly in Washington, D.C.

The United States State Department has announced to the Palestinian Authority/Palestinian Liberation Organization Mission representative in the United States that its status will be upgraded from a ‘bureau’ to that of a ”general delegation’ and that this change will allow the office in which the representation is situated to fly the PLO, now also the Palestine Authority, flag at its entrance.

In addition, the upgrading grants certain privileges to the delegation staff, such as diplomatic immunity, although it is not equal to embassy status.

The PLO’s chief representative in the United States, Maen Areikat, said that this step makes the PLO’s status in the United States equivalent to its status in Canada and many western European countries.

Israel Radio reported that sources in Prime Minister Netanyahu’s office said that the Prime Minister knew of the planned step and did not object to it. Diplomatic sources in Jerusalem claimed that the step was taken to strengthen Abu Mazen and try to get him to agree to direct talks with Israel. However, they expressed disappointment that the White House did not make the upgrade contingent upon the cessation of the PA’s anti-Israel incitement.

IsraelNationalNews