Also, unknown is Obama’s status as a legitimate candidate for president, his ethnic background, his true religion and various and sundry other things.

Lets start with Larry Sinclair. Mr. Sinclair will be at a national press club conference on the 18th of this month to air formal accusations against Barack H. Obama. These accusations will include oral sex, drugs and an alleged tie in to the murder of a Mr. Young, who was a member of the church Obama attended. These accusations are disturbing, to say the least, especially the accusation about Mr. Young. It seems the rest only enhanses a politician’s standing with mainstream voters. Murder still remains unpopular with most people.

Also disturbing is the notion that Obama may not be a “natural born” citizen of the U.S.A.. His mother was only 18 years of age when Barack was born and the statute concerning citizen status states that the mother must be an adult citizen of the U.S.A. at least five (5) years for a child of that citizen to be a “natural born” citizen. This needs clarification, unless our Constitution no longer applies to only “natural born” citizens being elligeable to be president of the U.S.A..

Also in question (unproven claims by Obama notwithstanding) is Obama’s ethnicity. By all accounts, Obama is more of a caucasian/arab than an afro/american. Anyone can verify this with a simple google search.

As to Obama’s religious preference, it means little unless it turns out Obama has been less than truthful in the above matters. If Obama is a closet Muslim he should admit it. If he is an atheist he should admit it. It certainly matters to many of his followers. How many Christians would change their mind if the truth was that Obama is a Muslim, especially in today’s climate where Muslims are looked upon as second-class citizens?

As I said, truth is difficult to find. Would it not be profitable, especially for America’s future well-being, to know the truth? –jws